Skip to content

Ada County seems to be to vary animal management, canine ordinances.

Ada County leaders are contemplating whether or not to replace their animal ordinance to make it align extra carefully with state regulation associated to “harmful” canines and so as to add extra particular animal cruelty provisions.

At a Wednesday assembly, members of the Ada County Fee mentioned a brand new 24-page animal ordinance, which might exchange the shorter current ordinance.

Underneath present county regulation, canines could be declared “vicious” by means of a listening to course of with the Idaho Humane Society. If a canine is set to be “vicious,” will probably be killed, although canine house owners can enchantment the society’s choices to a Justice of the Peace choose.

Underneath the brand new ordinance, canine house owners would have the ability to hold a problematic canine in some cases, as long as the canine is licensed with the county, micro-chipped, enclosed on the proprietor’s property, muzzled when out in public, inspected yearly and has legal responsibility insurance coverage, in keeping with a draft of the ordinance. Harmful canine determinations may nonetheless be appealed in courtroom.

The brand new ordinance is a part of an effort by the Humane Society to reform animal management ordinances across the Treasure Valley, which the group says will assist officers imposing the legal guidelines decide when a canine is basically harmful, and also will permit pet house owners to maintain their pets with restrictions once they do not pose a critical hazard to the general public.

Underneath the prevailing ordinance, any canine ​​that barks on the mailman could possibly be discovered to have posed an attacking angle, and be deemed harmful, stated Jeff Rosenthal, the CEO of the Idaho Humane Society.

By including particular descriptions of cruelty to the regulation, the Humane Society additionally hopes will probably be simpler to show in courtroom that animals are being mistreated.

Kuna not too long ago handed a brand new harmful canine ordinance, and Boise up to date its code in 2021, as a part of an initiative to reform animal cruelty legal guidelines by former Council Member TJ Thomson. Meridian is within the means of updating its ordinance.

How is a ‘harmful’ canine outlined?

The present code defines a harmful canine as a canine that “approaches any individual in an obvious angle of assault.”

“You’ll be able to think about how imprecise that’s,” Rosenthal stated, including that it could possibly be utilized to a canine that’s not actually a menace, and that such a definition has been discovered to be unconstitutional in some jurisdictions across the nation.

Rosenthal stated most canines have excessive chunk inhibition, often known as “tender mouth,” the place they’ve realized to softly chunk throughout play or in different cases. He stated his personal canine is an instance.

“I’ve a little bit canine that has very excessive chunk inhibition. He bites me on a regular basis, however I by no means get damage,” Rosenthal stated, noting that such conduct is usually a nuisance, however that it is “probably not the sort of public security problem that we’re frightened about right here.”

In some cases, any canine ​​may chunk somebody, but it surely does not imply the canine is a menace to the general public. Examples embody a canine biting somebody who stepped on the canine’s tail, or a canine biting somebody who positioned the canine beneath duress or precipitated it loads of ache.

Different canines not often chunk folks, however once they do they trigger main accidents. These are what the ordinance is supposed to ban.

“These are animals that we can not have in our society,” he stated. “Each harmful canine ordinance and statute is imperfect … However I believe (the brand new ordinance) offers a reasonably affordable strategy to the issue that prioritizes public security.”

Since Boise up to date its code, there are three registered “harmful” canines nonetheless beneath the care of their house owners in Boise, and there have been no additional incidents, Tiffany Shields, the director of animal management providers, stated on the assembly.

Rosenthal stated one other drawback with the prevailing regulation is {that a} state regulation, handed in 2016, is extra just like what the up to date regulation can be, leaving a big discrepancy in how the legal guidelines could be enforced at the moment.

“If I do not such as you, I take advantage of the unfair code, but when I such as you, I take advantage of the opposite one,” Rosenthal stated. “We have to simply make our native codes extra in line with the state code. The do not must be precisely the identical. They are often extra strict. It may be a little bit bit totally different. But when they’re vastly totally different, that is an issue for my group.”

Rosenthal additionally famous that he hopes the brand new regulation will result in extra reporting of drawback canines by the general public. Previously, he stated neighbors are sometimes hesitant to report an issue canine as a result of they know that, if declared harmful, the canine will likely be killed.

By including choices for an individual to maintain an issue canine beneath sure situations, folks ought to really feel that there is extra due course of, and be extra prone to come ahead with critical issues, he stated.

Commissioners requested questions on how the regulation pertains to service animals, that are required to be allowed beneath the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Rosenthal stated the Humane Society helps service animals and does not interrogate somebody about whether or not a service animal is reputable or not, as that would result in lawsuits.

Current regulation permits an individual to have a most of 4 canines with out acquiring a kennel license. The brand new regulation would restrict residents to a mixed 4 canines and cats with out such a license.

Underneath the brand new ordinance, an proprietor with a canine that bites another person — or a companion animal — and does not trigger critical damage can be responsible of a $150 infraction. If the canine bites somebody once more inside 12 months, the incident can be a misdemeanor, punishable by a positive of $1,000 and as much as 30 days in jail. A chunk inflicting critical damage can be a misdemeanor the primary time.

animal cruelty

In contrast to the state provisions about harmful canines, the Idaho statute that defines animal cruelty will not be particular. That implies that prosecutors should “begin from sq. one” to show in courtroom that an animal is being mistreated.

“Why is hitting a canine with a hammer 20 occasions cruelty? You must show that,” Rosenthal stated.

By enumerating definitions of cruelty extra clearly, the Humane Society expects a cruelty cost to be simpler to determine in courtroom.


The county has requested the general public concerning the new ordinance, and the first responses it has obtained relate to considerations about feral cats killing birds and a want to not have further charges, in keeping with Elizabeth Duncan, a spokesperson for the fee.

Free-ranging cats have been estimated to kill between 1.3 and 4 billion birds every year within the US

Rosen stated that the Humane Society will sterilize cats that it receives with out an proprietor, and that it usually returns them to the sector. He stated cats are a part of our communities and can keep feral populations no matter what animal shelters do.

Duncan stated the county plans to do extra outreach earlier than the ordinance comes earlier than the fee once more at an open enterprise assembly on Nov. 29.

Associated tales from Idaho Statesman

Ian Max Stevenson covers town of Boise and local weather change on the Idaho Statesman. In case you like seeing tales like this, please take into account supporting our work with a subscription to our newspaper.
Help my work with a digital subscription


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *