Skip to content

Drive Free or Die? New Hampshire Invoice to Limit Pets in Vehicles Begins Dogfight

New Now you can take heed to Insurance coverage Journal articles!

New Hampshire is the one state that enables adults to drive with out sporting seatbelts. Wish to use your canine as an alternative? Go for it, for now.

Whereas the state at the moment has no lapdog-related legal guidelines, the Legislature is contemplating a invoice that might make it unlawful for somebody to drive with “an animal of any measurement on their particular person.” The proposal is probably going a longshot within the “Stay Free or Die” state, however it’s producing loads of debate.

“I by no means in my wildest desires thought that this is able to change into probably the most controversial payments of the session, however by God, right here we’re,” stated the sponsor, state Rep. Jennifer Rhodes.

Rhodes, a Republican from Winchester, drafted the invoice after watching a younger woman almost get struck by a automobile pushed by a person holding two small canine with one arm and petting them with the opposite. When her rage subsided, she determined to take motion.

“I had a golden alternative to make a optimistic change, so I did it,” she stated. “I believed it was a no brainer.”

However as phrase bought round, offended emails arrived. One author, whom Rhodes declined to establish, argued {that a} well-behaved lapdog can be much less distracting than an animal whining from the backseat.

“If I’m driving my sick canine (or cat, or different pet) to the vet for medical consideration or to be euthanized, you’ll be able to wager your backside greenback that I’ll have (and have had) that animal in my lap for that presumably remaining journey with them,” the particular person wrote. “Please keep out of individuals’s vehicles and let folks have a small slice of happiness within the sanctity of their very own automobiles.”

Hawaii is the one state that particularly prohibits drivers from holding animals on their laps, Rhodes stated, although such drivers might face prices beneath broader distracted driving legal guidelines in a number of states. Rhode Island requires pets in automobiles to be restrained or beneath the bodily management of somebody aside from the motive force, whereas in New Jersey, pets in transferring automobiles should be secured in a service or put on seat belts. The New Hampshire invoice, which topics violators to $100 fines, would not go that far.

“If you’d like your canine to be within the backseat and have his head out the window, nice. Would you like your canine to be within the passenger seat up there with you? That is nice. All we’re attempting to do is say that the canine shouldn’t be in your particular person in any respect,” Rhodes stated.

The invoice has the help of Cheshire County Sheriff Eli Rivera, who informed the state Home Transportation Committee final week that he has seen drivers with canine of all styles and sizes on their laps.

“I’ve seen canine operating backwards and forwards between the entrance seat, the again seat, looking one window, looking the opposite window. I’ve seen drivers holding a pet with their left hand, and so they’re attempting to look over the canine as they’re driving down the highway,” he stated. “It does trigger a hazard.”

Maria Doval, of Hopkinton, stated she is going to abide by the legislation whether it is modified, however for now, lets her canine trip on her lap to his grooming and veterinary appointments, plus weekly journeys to doggie day care. Pancho, a 7-pound Maltese Shih Tzu with excessive separation anxiousness, hates the automobile however stays calm if Doval retains a decent grip on her harness as she drives.

“He is actually simply looking the window from my lap,” she stated. “He isn’t free roaming, as a result of I believe that might be a distraction.”

Whereas Rhodes stated she has confronted pushback from folks “who actually do not wish to be informed what to do” on precept, she stated many of the opposition comes from individuals who genuinely love their pets.

“They suppose that I am someway punishing them, after I do not have a look at this as punishment in any approach, form or type,” stated Rhodes. “I am it as the security of the pet.”

Copyright 2023 Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials will not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Subjects
New Hampshire

A very powerful insurance coverage information, in your inbox each enterprise day.

Get the insurance coverage business’s trusted publication

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *